Latest from Super User
25565 comments
-
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 11:18
posted by iqos คุณสาบัตื
Oh, dude, 337 is ɑctually а prіme number! Іt's
lіke the VIP оf numƅers, only divisible bу 1 and itѕeⅼf.
Ѕo, if you're looқing for a numbeг that's exclusive аnd
ReaԀ more
Factoring ɑnd Multiples
+1
Ꮤhɑt is thе HCF for 540 and 630?
Asked by Wiki User
Well, isn't thɑt a һappy little question! The
Higheѕt Comkmon Factor (HCF) of 540 and 630 is 90. Y᧐u see,
the HCF iѕ thе largest number that divides Ƅoth 540 and
Ꮢead moгe
Math and Arithmetic
+2
What numbers are relatively prime ᴡith 18?
Asked by Wiki User
Оh, dude, "relatively prime" juѕt means two numbeгs һave no common factods օther than 1.
Ѕo, numbers that are rеlatively ⲣrime witһ 18 are oneѕ that d
Ꮢead m᧐re
Prime Numbers
Ԝhat іs the sum of all ρrime number from 61 to 97?
Asked Ƅy Wiki Uѕeг
Τo find tһе sum of aⅼl рrime numberѕ Ьetween 61 and 97, wwe first identify tһе
prime numbers within thiѕ range: 61, 67, 71, 73, 79,
83, 89, and 97. Adding tһеse
Rеad more
Math аnd Arithmetic
+1
Ꮃhat tѡo ⲣrime numbeгѕ aɗd up tto 52?
Asked by Wiki User
23 and 29. -
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 11:17
posted by アンドエックス ファンド
ありとあらゆる方向に平気な顔してご迷惑をかけていた。 】これであなたも人気者!浜村弘一(編)「読者が選ぶ 期待の新作トップ30ランクインソフト情報 The
Last of Us(ラスト・ など、親友の婚約者と認識しながらも、かなり手荒く扱っている。約款』(変額保険の場合は、これに加え「特別勘定のしおり」)を必ずご覧ください。以降は、第58回(2007年)で行われたのが最後だった。 -
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 10:56
posted by 北海道 フェリー料金
※サイズ:27×30×1cm ※木製額に入れてお届け(前面:透明樹脂板) ※掲載画像はパソコンで制作した直筆イメージ画像です。
そして資金調達とともに上昇する時価総額。社員総出で行う研修と会員交流をかねたイベント「WeWorkサマーキャンプ」で同氏は乱痴気騒ぎをする。広いスペースでデザインされたオフィスを自由に使い、時には用意されたコーヒー、ビールを飲みながら語り、イベントなどを通じて他の会員と知り合う──WeWorkにさまざまな交流の仕掛けが準備されているのは日本でも知られているとおりだ。 ニューマン氏の破天荒さは、U-NEXTが9月30日から日本での独占配信を開始した『WeWork/470億ドル企業を崩落させた男』というドキュメンタリー映画からも見て取れる。 ギフトを遠回しに要求してくる配信者が多いように感じている。 -
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 10:22
posted by サッカー選手 長谷部
劇団ひとりは「嫁も出てた」とおのろけ - 映画ニュース【Movie
Walker/山崎伸子】". 【声優】山寺宏一さん日本音声製作者連盟 - アニメ音響制作 外国映画・ "映画『ジェミニマン』2人のウィル・ ︎.
2023年7月10日閲覧。 『エクスペンダブルズ2』オフィシャルサイト.
2023年7月10日閲覧。 Rocketnews24. 2023年3月14日閲覧。 テレ朝POST (2018年3月7日).
2021年1月2日閲覧。 "山寺宏一の忘れられない現場、オーディションでようやく勝ち取った役とは??提供:TBSラジオ「山形純菜 プレシャスサンデー」". -
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 05:18
posted by ร้านขายพวงหรีด ใกล้ฉัน
Socretese
-
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 05:06
posted by พวง หรีด ใกล้ฉัน
Lady Gaga fans are begging the singer to do a global tour - two years after her last tour, The Chromatica Ball.
The pop superstar, 38, is preparing to release
her seventh album, with fans hoping this will lead to a string of concerts.
However, a Live Nation spokesperson confirmed: 'There is no 2025 tour planned.'
The Sun reports that Lady Gaga will instead tour in 2026.
It comes as the hitmaker is set to release her new song Disease
on Friday, as the first single from her forthcoming seventh album.
Lady Gaga fans are begging the singer to
do a global tour - two years after her last tour, The Chromatica Ball (pictured last year)
The pop superstar, 38, is preparing to release her seventh album, with fans hoping this
will lead to a string of concerts (pictured in 2022 on last tour)
It comes as the hitmaker is set to release her new song Disease
on Friday, as the first single from her forthcoming seventh album
Lady Gaga teased the release on her Instagram, sharing a teaser clip from the viewpoint
of an approaching vehicle, with her seen running away from it.
Read More
Joker: Folie À Deux is branded 'bleak' and the 'most disappointing follow-up' by critics
Variety reported the Grammy winner's label Universal Music put out pre-saves for
the forthcoming single, with links to Spotify and Apple Music,
on Monday.
Lady Gaga also made public a Spotify playlist in which her letters in her songs spelled out the phrase
'Gaga Disease,' according to the outlet.
The Star is Born actress also shared a photo of what appeared
to be her figure splayed across the front of a car
with the phrase 'Disease' painted on the street, and a series of dates, times and cities.
And fans are hoping that this announcement marks the start of the singer's comeback.
Following the news, many took to X to beg the Judas songstress to go
on tour for her latest project with some jokingly saying
they would give her everything they owned for her to tour.
Lady Gaga teased the release on her Instagram, sharing a teaser clip from the viewpoint of
an approaching vehicle, with her seen running away from it
The Star is Born actress also shared a photo of what appeared to be her figure splayed across the front of a car with
the phrase 'Disease' painted on the street, and a series of dates, times and cities
One fan said: 'GOD PLEASE TAKE MY BANK ACCOUNT, TRIPLE IT
AND GIVE IT ALL TO GAGA FOR THIS TOUR'
Others wrote: 'Can't wait for the tour #DISEASE will be amazing live!!!
#LG7IsComing'
'Listened to the new and cried!! I know she's back which means a new tour!
'I will be spending all of my money and seeing Lady Gaga on multiple tour dates
'ok lady gaga release the album and go on tour .. sweetheart
'I MISS YOU GO ON TOUR!!!
'My bank account will hate me once Lady Gaga announces the new tour!
'It's so wonderful, I missed this, come with a tour soon
'I NEED A WORLD TOUR MAMA'
Following the news, many took to X to beg the Judas songstress to go on tour for her latest project with some jokingly saying they would give her everything they owned for her to tour
The singer, whose hits include Bad Romance, Born This
Way, Just Dance and Poker Face, is headed back to her pop persona following the September
release of her album Harlequin, which was inspired by her film, Joker: Folie
à Deux.
Among the tracks on the album included two new songs, and standards
such as That's Entertainment, That's Life and Get Happy.
Like the film, it was not an initial commercial success, marking her lowest ever entry for
a full-length record on the Billboard 200 charts at number 20.
Joker: Folie à Deux saw Lady Gaga play Harley Quinn opposite
Joaquin Phoenix's Joker, who earned the Best Actor Oscar for his performance in the franchise's
2019 film
But the sequel was critically panned and became a huge flop, with it being reported it 'could potentially lose $150 to
$200 million' despite studio insiders saying it would break even.
The singer, whose hits include Bad Romance, Born This Way, Just
Dance and Poker Face, is headed back to her pop persona following the September
release of her album Harlequin , which was inspired
by her film, Joker: Folie à Deux (pictured last month)
The film saw her play Harley Quinn opposite Joaquin Phoenix's Joker, who
earned the Best Actor Oscar for his performance in the franchise's 2019 film (pictured)
But the sequel was critically panned and became a huge flop, with
it being reported it ' could potentially lose
$150 to $200 million ' despite studio insiders saying it would break even
The Warner Bros. film has made $192.2 million worldwide,
with $56.6 million in domestic box office revenue,
according to Box Office Mojo.
Some fans have said that despite the film's initial failure financially and with critics, it will be looked
upon favorably years from now.
Lady Gaga has had some commercial success in recent months with her pairing with
Bruno Mars on Die With a Smile, which was released in August, landing in the
third spot on Billboard's Hot 100.
In 2020, she put out the studio album Chromatica, which initially landed
in the top spot upon its debut and included the hit single Rain on Me, a collaboration with Ariana Grande.
InstagramOasisSpotifyLady GagaColdplay -
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 04:13
posted by ร้านทํา พวงหรีดใกล้ฉัน
Smile 2 - starring Naomi Scott, Lukas Gage and Jack Nicholson's son Ray - emerged as the winner after a horror movie box office showdown.
The fright flick eclipsed hot contender Terrifier 3 for the top spot.
The Smile sequel starring Scott, 31, as a pop star who begins
experiencing terrifying and inexplicable events as she prepares for a world tour, opened wide in more than 3,600 theaters, pulling in a payday of $23 million.
Ray, whose mom is Nicholson's former partner Rebecca Broussard,
shocked fans with an eerie grin in the new movie, which was
near-identical to the Oscar-winner's maniacal
smile as Jack Torrance in the 1980 Stanley Kubrick classic, The
Shining.
In a legendary scene, an insane Jack hacks at a bathroom door
with an axe as his cowering wife Wendy (Shelley Duvall) screams inside.
As he busts a hole in the door, he sticks his face through, grins and exclaims: 'Here's Johnny!' in an improvised line.
The original Smile, released in September 2022,
and starring Sosie Bacon, was a sleeper hit, which was well received and earned $217,408,513 globally.
Smile 2 has received a 83-percent critics rating
on Rotten Tomatoes and an 83-percent Popcornmeter rating
from audiences.
Smile 2 stars Jack Nicholson's son Ray (left).
In the new horror, he recreated the Oscar-winner's
maniacal smile as Jack Torrance in the 1980 Stanley Kubrick classic, The Shining
Smile 2's big win at the box office has production companies Paramount Pictures
and Temple Hill beaming from ear to ear. The fright
flight opened in first place with a payday of $23 million
Read More
Smile 2 actor is spitting image of horror icon father in eerie
scene
The Wild Robot remained in second place after making its debut last week.
The animated feature about a shipwrecked robot who lands on an island inhabited only by wild animals has delighted audiences young and not so young to the tune of $10.1 million, according to Box Office Mojo.
Last week's champ, Terrifier 3 dropped to third place.
In this latest chapter of the franchise, Art the Clown is determined to slash his
way through a small town preparing for the Christmas holidays in order to finish the work he started with a
Halloween massacre in Terrifier 2.
Audiences have enjoyed the chase. Terrifier 3 kicked up
more than $9.3 million in ticket sales.
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice lost some ground to the new arrivals, but maintained a strong presence at theaters across the nation.
The haunted tale starring Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder and Jenna Ortega conjured up
an even $5 million and a fourth place finish.
Landing in fifth place after opening in wider release was We Live in Time.
Naomi Scott stars in Smile 2 as a pop star preparing for a world tour
who encounters a series of terrifying and inexplicable events
The Wild Robot remained in second place after making its debut last week.
The animated feature about a shipwrecked robot who lands on an island inhabited only
by wild animals has delighted audiences young and not so young to the tune of $10.1 million this week
Last week's champ, Terrifier 3 dropped to third place.
The story follows Art the Clown as he tries to slash his way through
a small town preparing for the Christmas holidays. The fright flick pulled in more than $9.3 million in ticket sales
The romantic drama, starring Andrew Garfield and Florence Pugh as a couple who find themselves in a race
against time, is a hit with critics and audiences alike, earning $4.185 million over the weekend.
Joker:Folie à Deux continues its descent as audiences
lose interested in the Joker sequel.
After three weeks in theaters, the film starring Joaquin Phoenix
and Lady Gaga has landed in sixth place with a take of $2.18 million.
The movie has yet to cover its $200 million budget,
but is inching toward it. So far the comic inspired film has collected $191,942,948 globally.
Beetlejuice Beetlejuice lost some ground to the new arrivals, but
maintained a strong presence at theaters across the
nation. The haunted tale starring Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder and Jenna Ortega
conjured up an even $5 million and a fourth place finish
Landing in fifth place after opening in wider release was
We Live in Time. The romantic drama starring Andrew Garfield and
Florence Pugh as a couple who find themselves in a race against time is a hit with
critics and audiences alike, earning $4.185
million over the weekend
Piece by Piece, Pharrell Williams' creative biopic, fell two
spots to sixth place.
The musical adventure told with Lego characters to illustrate the singer and songwriter's rise to fame continues to
do well with audiences, this week putting together a payday of
$2.1 million.
Transformers One parked in eighth place.
Joker:Folie à Deux continues its descent as audiences lose interested in the Joker sequel.
After three weeks in theaters, the film starring Joaquin Phoenix
and Lady Gaga has landed in sixth place with a take of $2.18 million
Piece by Piece, Pharrell Williams' creative biopic, fell two spots to sixth place with payday of $2.1 million
Transformers One parked in eighth place with earnings
of nearly $2 million
Saturday Night, the film about the chaos behind the first ever episode of late night staple Saturday
Night Live, dropped in the ratings to ninth place making $1.8 million its
fourth weekend in theaters
The Nightmare Before Christmas re-release rounds out
the top ten with $1.129 million beneath the tree
The animated adventure starring the voices of Chris Hemsworth and Brian Tyree
Henry in the origin story for the beloved Optimus Prime and the evil Megatron roared away with nearly $2 million.
Saturday Night, the film about the chaos behind the first ever episode of late night staple
Saturday Night Live, dropped in the ratings to ninth place.
The dramady starring Gabriel LaBell as SNL creator Lorne Michaels made $1.8 million its fourth weekend
in theaters.
The Nightmare Before Christmas re-release rounds out the top ten. The Tim Burton animated classic found $1.129
million under the tree, as the film enjoys a renaissance with
fans and their progeny celebrating some three decades since it first appeared in theaters.
Naomi ScottJack NicholsonLukas Gage -
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 02:09
posted by ร้านดอกไม้ จตุจักร
id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading">Search results
Help
English
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar hide
Actions
General -
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 01:59
posted by ดอกไม้ไว้อาลัย สีดำ
Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that transparency and integrity is
at the heart of their reason for entering Parliament in the first place hear themselves?
In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments against proposed electoral reforms that the major parties
look set to come together to support.
The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy individuals
can donate, caps on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms race, and a $90million limit
on what any party can spend at an election - actually less than the major parties currently spend.
The proposed new laws also include lower
disclosure thresholds for donations, thus increasing the transparency
of who makes political donations in the first place.
So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their cash to influence election outcomes - and the extent to which they can use their wealth at all will be
limited.
The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the speed and frequency that
disclosures of donations need to be made.
At present we have the absurd situation in which donations get made - but you only find out the
details of who has given what to whom many months later, well after elections are
won and lost.
In other words, what is broadly being proposed will result
in much greater transparency and far less big money being
injected into campaigning by the wealthy.
Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were 'running scared'
with the policy and warned the reform would 'not stop the rot'
Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot - saying if it serves
only the major parties 'it's a rort, not reform'. Teal independent ACT
senator David Pocock (right) said: 'What seems to be
happening is a major-party stitch-up'
Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political party, as opposed to $16,000 under the current
rules, will need to disclose having done so.
And how much they can donate will be capped.
Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the
proposed new laws, labeling them a 'stitch-up', 'outrageous' and 'a rort, not a reform'.
They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor's proposal just might secure the
support of the opposition.
I had to double check who was criticising
what exactly before even starting to write this column.
Because I had assumed - incorrectly - that these important transparency
measures stamping out the influence of the wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens or
the corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench effort to drag the major parties closer to accountability.
More fool me.
The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put forward by
Labor and is opposed by a growing cabal
of crossbenchers.
It makes you wonder what they have to hide. Put simply, the Greens and Teals doth protest too much on this issue.
Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political donors such as Clive Palmer
Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal funder
Simon Holmes à Court
The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to
their irregular calls to tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)
The major parties have long complained about the influence the
likes of Simon Holmes à Court wields behind the
scenes amongst the Teals.
And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the
past, contrary to their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.
Now that tangible change has been proposed,
these bastions of virtue are running a mile from reforms that
will curtail dark art of political donations.
The Labor government isn't even seeking for these transparency rules to take effect
immediately, by the way. It won't be some sort of quick-paced power play before the next election designed to catch the
crossbench out.
They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough
time to absorb and understand the changes before preparing
for them.
Don't get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor and the Coalition. I imagine the opposition want
to go over the laws with a fine tooth comb.
As they should - because it certainly isn't beyond Labor to include hidden one-party advantages in the proposed design which would create loopholes only the unions are capable of taking advantage of,
therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years
to come.
But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a deal to get these proposed laws implemented,
the crossbench should offer their support, not cynical opposition, to
what is being advocated for.
They might even be able to offer something worthwhile that could be incorporated in the
package.
To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false commentary about
being in politics to 'clean things up'. -
Comment Link
nedeľa, 01 december 2024 00:32
posted by สรวง diy หนองจอก
Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that
transparency and integrity is at the heart of their reason for entering Parliament
in the first place hear themselves?
In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments against
proposed electoral reforms that the major parties look set to come together to support.
The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy
individuals can donate, caps on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms race, and a $90million limit on what any party can spend at an election - actually less than the
major parties currently spend.
The proposed new laws also include lower disclosure thresholds for donations, thus
increasing the transparency of who makes political donations in the first place.
So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their
cash to influence election outcomes - and the extent to which they can use their wealth at all will be limited.
The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the speed and frequency that disclosures of donations need to be made.
At present we have the absurd situation in which donations get made - but you only find out the details of who has given what to whom many months later,
well after elections are won and lost.
In other words, what is broadly being proposed
will result in much greater transparency and far less big money being injected into campaigning
by the wealthy.
Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were 'running scared' with the policy and warned the reform
would 'not stop the rot'
Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot - saying if it serves only
the major parties 'it's a rort, not reform'. Teal independent ACT senator David
Pocock (right) said: 'What seems to be happening is a major-party stitch-up'
Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political party, as
opposed to $16,000 under the current rules, will need to disclose having
done so. And how much they can donate will be capped.
Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the proposed new laws, labeling
them a 'stitch-up', 'outrageous' and 'a rort, not a reform'.
They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor's
proposal just might secure the support of the opposition.
I had to double check who was criticising what exactly before even starting to write this column.
Because I had assumed - incorrectly - that these important transparency measures stamping out the influence of
the wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens or the
corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench effort to drag the major parties closer to accountability.
More fool me.
The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put forward by Labor and is opposed by a growing cabal of crossbenchers.
It makes you wonder what they have to hide.
Put simply, the Greens and Teals doth protest too much on this issue.
Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political
donors such as Clive Palmer
Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal funder Simon Holmes à Court
The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to their irregular calls
to tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator
Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)
The major parties have long complained about the influence the likes of Simon Holmes
à Court wields behind the scenes amongst the Teals.
And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the past, contrary to their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.
Now that tangible change has been proposed, these bastions of virtue are running a mile from reforms that will
curtail dark art of political donations.
The Labor government isn't even seeking for these
transparency rules to take effect immediately, by the way.
It won't be some sort of quick-paced power play before the next election designed
to catch the crossbench out.
They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough time to absorb and understand the changes
before preparing for them.
Don't get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor
and the Coalition. I imagine the opposition want to go over the
laws with a fine tooth comb.
As they should - because it certainly isn't beyond Labor to include hidden one-party advantages in the proposed design which would create loopholes only the unions are capable
of taking advantage of, therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years
to come.
But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a deal to get these proposed laws implemented, the crossbench should offer their support, not cynical opposition, to what is being advocated for.
They might even be able to offer something worthwhile
that could be incorporated in the package.
To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false commentary
about being in politics to 'clean things up'.
Leave a comment
Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.
Copyright © . All rights reserved.