42140 comments

• Comment Link nedeľa, 01 december 2024 05:06 posted by พวง หรีด ใกล้ฉัน

  Lady Gaga fans are begging the singer to do a global tour - two years after her last tour, The Chromatica Ball.
  
  
  
  The pop superstar, 38, is preparing to release
  her seventh album, with fans hoping this will lead to a string of concerts. 
  
  However, a Live Nation spokesperson confirmed: 'There is no 2025 tour planned.'
  
  The Sun reports that Lady Gaga will instead tour in 2026.
  
  
  It comes as the hitmaker is set to release her new song Disease
  on Friday, as the first single from her forthcoming seventh album.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Lady Gaga fans are begging the singer to
  do a global tour - two years after her last tour, The Chromatica Ball (pictured last year)
  
  
  
  
  
  The pop superstar, 38, is preparing to release her seventh album, with fans hoping this
  will lead to a string of concerts (pictured in 2022 on last tour)
  
  
  
  
  
  It comes as the hitmaker is set to release her new song Disease
  on Friday, as the first single from her forthcoming seventh album 
  
  Lady Gaga teased the release on her Instagram, sharing a teaser clip from the viewpoint
  of an approaching vehicle, with her seen running away from it.
  
  
  
  
  Read More
  
  Joker: Folie À Deux is branded 'bleak' and the 'most disappointing follow-up' by critics
  
  
  Variety reported the Grammy winner's label Universal Music put out pre-saves for
  the forthcoming single, with links to Spotify and Apple Music,
  on Monday.
  
  Lady Gaga also made public a Spotify playlist in which her letters in her songs spelled out the phrase
  'Gaga Disease,' according to the outlet.
  
  The Star is Born actress also shared a photo of what appeared
  to be her figure splayed across the front of a car
  with the phrase 'Disease' painted on the street, and a series of dates, times and cities.
  
  
  
  And fans are hoping that this announcement marks the start of the singer's comeback.
  
  
  Following the news, many took to X to beg the Judas songstress to go
  on tour for her latest project with some jokingly saying
  they would give her everything they owned for her to tour.
  
  
  
  
  
  Lady Gaga teased the release on her Instagram, sharing a teaser clip from the viewpoint of
  an approaching vehicle, with her seen running away from it
  
  
  
  
  
  The Star is Born actress also shared a photo of what appeared to be her figure splayed across the front of a car with
  the phrase 'Disease' painted on the street, and a series of dates, times and cities 
  
  One fan said: 'GOD PLEASE TAKE MY BANK ACCOUNT, TRIPLE IT
  AND GIVE IT ALL TO GAGA FOR THIS TOUR'
  
  Others wrote: 'Can't wait for the tour #DISEASE will be amazing live!!!
  #LG7IsComing'
  
  'Listened to the new and cried!! I know she's back which means a new tour!
  
  
  'I will be spending all of my money and seeing Lady Gaga on multiple tour dates
  
  'ok lady gaga release the album and go on tour .. sweetheart
  
  'I MISS YOU GO ON TOUR!!! 
  
  'My bank account will hate me once Lady Gaga announces the new tour! 
  
  'It's so wonderful, I missed this, come with a tour soon
  
  'I NEED A WORLD TOUR MAMA' 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Following the news, many took to X to beg the Judas songstress to go on tour for her latest project with some jokingly saying they would give her everything they owned for her to tour
  
  The singer, whose hits include Bad Romance, Born This
  Way, Just Dance and Poker Face, is headed back to her pop persona following the September
  release of her album Harlequin, which was inspired by her film, Joker: Folie
  à Deux.
  
  Among the tracks on the album included two new songs, and standards
  such as That's Entertainment, That's Life and Get Happy.
  
  
  Like the film, it was not an initial commercial success, marking her lowest ever entry for
  a full-length record on the Billboard 200 charts at number 20.
  
  
  Joker: Folie à Deux saw Lady Gaga play Harley Quinn opposite
  Joaquin Phoenix's Joker, who earned the Best Actor Oscar for his performance in the franchise's
  2019 film
  
  But the sequel was critically panned and became a huge flop, with it being reported it 'could potentially lose $150 to
  $200 million' despite studio insiders saying it would break even.
  
  
  
  
  
  The singer, whose hits include Bad Romance, Born This Way, Just
  Dance and Poker Face, is headed back to her pop persona following the September
  release of her album Harlequin , which was inspired
  by her film, Joker: Folie à Deux (pictured last month)
  
  
  
  
  
  The film saw her play Harley Quinn opposite Joaquin Phoenix's Joker, who
  earned the Best Actor Oscar for his performance in the franchise's 2019 film (pictured)
  
  
  
  
  
  But the sequel was critically panned and became a huge flop, with
  it being reported it ' could potentially lose
  $150 to $200 million ' despite studio insiders saying it would break even
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  The Warner Bros. film has made $192.2 million worldwide,
  with $56.6 million in domestic box office revenue,
  according to Box Office Mojo.
  
  Some fans have said that despite the film's initial failure financially and with critics, it will be looked
  upon favorably years from now.
  
  Lady Gaga has had some commercial success in recent months with her pairing with
  Bruno Mars on Die With a Smile, which was released in August, landing in the
  third spot on Billboard's Hot 100.
  
  In 2020, she put out the studio album Chromatica, which initially landed
  in the top spot upon its debut and included the hit single Rain on Me, a collaboration with Ariana Grande.
  
  
  
  InstagramOasisSpotifyLady GagaColdplay
• Comment Link nedeľa, 01 december 2024 04:13 posted by ร้านทํา พวงหรีดใกล้ฉัน

  Smile 2 - starring Naomi Scott, Lukas Gage and Jack Nicholson's son Ray - emerged as the winner after a horror movie box office showdown.
  
  The fright flick eclipsed hot contender Terrifier 3 for the top spot.
  
  
  The Smile sequel starring Scott, 31,  as a pop star who begins
  experiencing terrifying and inexplicable events as she prepares for a world tour, opened wide in more than 3,600 theaters, pulling in a payday of $23 million.
  
  Ray, whose mom is Nicholson's former partner Rebecca Broussard,
  shocked fans with an eerie grin in the new movie, which was
  near-identical to the Oscar-winner's maniacal
  smile as Jack Torrance in the 1980 Stanley Kubrick classic, The
  Shining.
  
  In a legendary scene, an insane Jack hacks at a bathroom door
  with an axe as his cowering wife Wendy (Shelley Duvall) screams inside.
  
  As he busts a hole in the door, he sticks his face through, grins and exclaims: 'Here's Johnny!' in an improvised line.
  
  
  The original Smile, released in September 2022,
  and starring Sosie Bacon, was a sleeper hit, which was well received and earned $217,408,513 globally.
  
  
  Smile 2 has received a 83-percent critics rating
  on Rotten Tomatoes and an 83-percent Popcornmeter rating
  from audiences. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Smile 2 stars Jack Nicholson's son Ray (left).
  
  In the new horror, he recreated the Oscar-winner's
  maniacal smile as Jack Torrance in the 1980 Stanley Kubrick classic, The Shining
  
  
  
  
  
  Smile 2's big win at the box office has production companies Paramount Pictures
  and Temple Hill beaming from ear to ear. The fright
  flight opened in first place with a payday of $23 million 
  
  
  
  
  Read More
  
  Smile 2 actor is spitting image of horror icon father in eerie
  scene
  
  
  The Wild Robot remained in second place after making its debut last week. 
  
  The animated feature about a shipwrecked robot who lands on an island inhabited only by wild animals has delighted audiences young and not so young to the tune of $10.1 million, according to Box Office Mojo. 
  
  Last week's champ, Terrifier 3 dropped to third place. 
  
  In this latest chapter of the franchise, Art the Clown is determined to slash his
  way through a small town preparing for the Christmas holidays in order to finish the work he started with a
  Halloween massacre in Terrifier 2. 
  
  Audiences have enjoyed the chase.  Terrifier 3 kicked up
  more than $9.3 million in ticket sales. 
  
  Beetlejuice Beetlejuice lost some ground to the new arrivals, but maintained a strong presence at theaters across the nation. 
  
  The haunted tale starring Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder and Jenna Ortega conjured up
  an even $5 million and a fourth place finish. 
  
  Landing in fifth place after opening in wider release was We Live in Time. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Naomi Scott stars in Smile 2 as a pop star preparing for a world tour
  who encounters a series of terrifying and inexplicable events
  
  
  
  
  
  The Wild Robot remained in second place after making its debut last week.
  The animated feature about a shipwrecked robot who lands on an island inhabited only
  by wild animals has delighted audiences young and not so young to the tune of $10.1 million this week
  
  
  
  
  
  Last week's champ, Terrifier 3 dropped to third place.
  
  The story follows Art the Clown as he tries to slash his way through
  a small town preparing for the Christmas holidays. The fright flick pulled in more than $9.3 million in ticket sales
  
  
  
  
  The romantic drama, starring Andrew Garfield and Florence Pugh as a couple who find themselves in a race
  against time, is a hit with critics and audiences alike, earning $4.185 million over the weekend. 
  
  Joker:Folie à Deux continues its descent as audiences
  lose interested in the Joker sequel. 
  
  After three weeks in theaters, the film starring Joaquin Phoenix
  and Lady Gaga has landed in sixth place with a take of $2.18 million. 
  
  The movie has yet to cover its $200 million budget,
  but is inching toward it. So far the comic inspired film has collected $191,942,948 globally. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Beetlejuice Beetlejuice lost some ground to the new arrivals, but
  maintained a strong presence at theaters across the
  nation. The haunted tale starring Michael Keaton, Winona Ryder and Jenna Ortega
  conjured up an even $5 million and a fourth place finish
  
  
  
  
  
  Landing in fifth place after opening in wider release was
  We Live in Time. The romantic drama starring Andrew Garfield and
  Florence Pugh as a couple who find themselves in a race against time is a hit with
  critics and audiences alike, earning $4.185
  million over the weekend
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Piece by Piece, Pharrell Williams' creative biopic, fell two
  spots to sixth place.
  
  The musical adventure told with Lego characters to illustrate the singer and songwriter's rise to fame continues to
  do well with audiences, this week putting together a payday of
  $2.1 million. 
  
  Transformers One parked in eighth place. 
  
  
  
  
  Joker:Folie à Deux continues its descent as audiences lose interested in the Joker sequel.
  After three weeks in theaters, the film starring Joaquin Phoenix
  and Lady Gaga has landed in sixth place with a take of $2.18 million
  
  
  
  
  
  Piece by Piece, Pharrell Williams' creative biopic, fell two spots to sixth place with payday of $2.1 million
  
  
  
  
  
  Transformers One parked in eighth place with earnings
  of nearly $2 million
  
  
  
  
  
  Saturday Night, the film about the chaos behind the first ever episode of late night staple Saturday
  Night Live, dropped in the ratings to ninth place making $1.8 million its
  fourth weekend in theaters
  
  
  
  
  
  The Nightmare Before Christmas re-release rounds out
  the top ten with $1.129 million beneath the tree 
  
  The animated adventure starring the voices of Chris Hemsworth and Brian Tyree
  Henry in the origin story for the beloved Optimus Prime and the evil Megatron roared away with nearly $2 million. 
  
  Saturday Night, the film about the chaos behind the first ever episode of late night staple
  Saturday Night Live, dropped in the ratings to ninth place.
  
  
  The dramady starring Gabriel LaBell as SNL creator Lorne Michaels made $1.8 million its fourth weekend
  in theaters. 
  
  The Nightmare Before Christmas re-release rounds out the top ten. The Tim Burton animated classic found $1.129
  million under the tree, as the film enjoys a renaissance with
  fans and their progeny celebrating some three decades since  it first appeared in theaters.
  
  
  
  
  Naomi ScottJack NicholsonLukas Gage
• Comment Link nedeľa, 01 december 2024 02:09 posted by ร้านดอกไม้ จตุจักร

  id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading">Search results
  
  Help
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  English
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Tools
  
  
  
  Tools
  move to sidebar hide
  
  Actions
  
  
  
  
  
  General
• Comment Link nedeľa, 01 december 2024 01:59 posted by ดอกไม้ไว้อาลัย สีดำ

  Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that transparency and integrity is
  at the heart of their reason for entering Parliament in the first place hear themselves?
  
  
  
  In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments against proposed electoral reforms that the major parties
  look set to come together to support.
  
  The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy individuals
  can donate, caps on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms race, and a $90million limit
  on what any party can spend at an election - actually less than the major parties currently spend.
  
  
  The proposed new laws also include lower
  disclosure thresholds for donations, thus increasing the transparency
  of who makes political donations in the first place.
  
  
  So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their cash to influence election outcomes - and the extent to which they can use their wealth at all will be
  limited.
  
  The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the speed and frequency that
  disclosures of donations need to be made.
  
  At present we have the absurd situation in which donations get made - but you only find out the
  details of who has given what to whom many months later, well after elections are
  won and lost.
  
  In other words, what is broadly being proposed will result
  in much greater transparency and far less big money being
  injected into campaigning by the wealthy.
  
  
  
  
  Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were 'running scared'
  with the policy and warned the reform would 'not stop the rot' 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot - saying if it serves
  only the major parties 'it's a rort, not reform'. Teal independent ACT
  senator David Pocock (right) said: 'What seems to be
  happening is a major-party stitch-up'
  
  Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political party, as opposed to $16,000 under the current
  rules, will need to disclose having done so.
  And how much they can donate will be capped.
  
  Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the
  proposed new laws, labeling them a 'stitch-up', 'outrageous' and 'a rort, not a reform'. 
  
  They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor's proposal just might secure the
  support of the opposition.
  
  I had to double check who was criticising
  what exactly before even starting to write this column.
  
  Because I had assumed - incorrectly - that these important transparency
  measures stamping out the influence of the wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens or
  the corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench effort to drag the major parties closer to accountability.
  
  
  
  More fool me.
  
  The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put forward by
  Labor and is opposed by a growing cabal
  of crossbenchers.
  
  It makes you wonder what they have to hide. Put simply, the Greens and Teals doth protest too much on this issue.
  
  
  
  
  
  Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political donors such as Clive Palmer
  
  
  
  
  
  Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal funder
  Simon Holmes à Court
  
  
  
  
  
  The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to
  their irregular calls to tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)
  
  The major parties have long complained about the influence the
  likes of Simon Holmes à Court wields behind the
  scenes amongst the Teals. 
  
  And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the
  past, contrary to their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.
  
  
  Now that tangible change has been proposed,
  these bastions of virtue are running a mile from reforms that
  will curtail dark art of political donations.
  
  The Labor government isn't even seeking for these transparency rules to take effect
  immediately, by the way. It won't be some sort of quick-paced power play before the next election designed to catch the
  crossbench out.
  
  They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough
  time to absorb and understand the changes before preparing
  for them.
  
  Don't get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor and the Coalition. I imagine the opposition want
  to go over the laws with a fine tooth comb.
  
  As they should - because it certainly isn't beyond Labor to include hidden one-party advantages in the proposed design which would create loopholes only the unions are capable of taking advantage of,
  therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years
  to come.
  
  But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a deal to get these proposed laws implemented,
  the crossbench should offer their support, not cynical opposition, to
  what is being advocated for.
  
  They might even be able to offer something worthwhile that could be incorporated in the
  package.
  
  To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false commentary about
  being in politics to 'clean things up'.
• Comment Link nedeľa, 01 december 2024 00:32 posted by สรวง diy หนองจอก

  Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that
  transparency and integrity is at the heart of their reason for entering Parliament
  in the first place hear themselves?
  
  In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments against
  proposed electoral reforms that the major parties look set to come together to support.
  
  
  The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy
  individuals can donate, caps on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms race, and a $90million limit on what any party can spend at an election - actually less than the
  major parties currently spend.
  
  The proposed new laws also include lower disclosure thresholds for donations, thus
  increasing the transparency of who makes political donations in the first place.
  
  
  
  So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while using their
  cash to influence election outcomes - and the extent to which they can use their wealth at all will be limited.
  
  
  The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the speed and frequency that disclosures of donations need to be made.
  
  
  
  At present we have the absurd situation in which donations get made - but you only find out the details of who has given what to whom many months later,
  well after elections are won and lost.
  
  In other words, what is broadly being proposed
  will result in much greater transparency and far less big money being injected into campaigning
  by the wealthy.
  
  
  
  
  Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were 'running scared' with the policy and warned the reform
  would 'not stop the rot' 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot - saying if it serves only
  the major parties 'it's a rort, not reform'. Teal independent ACT senator David
  Pocock (right) said: 'What seems to be happening is a major-party stitch-up'
  
  Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political party, as
  opposed to $16,000 under the current rules, will need to disclose having
  done so. And how much they can donate will be capped.
  
  Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the proposed new laws, labeling
  them a 'stitch-up', 'outrageous' and 'a rort, not a reform'. 
  
  They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor's
  proposal just might secure the support of the opposition.
  
  I had to double check who was criticising what exactly before even starting to write this column.
  
  Because I had assumed - incorrectly - that these important transparency measures stamping out the influence of
  the wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens or the
  corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench effort to drag the major parties closer to accountability.
  
  
  More fool me.
  
  The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put forward by Labor and is opposed by a growing cabal of crossbenchers.
  
  
  It makes you wonder what they have to hide.
  Put simply, the Greens and Teals doth protest too much on this issue.
  
  
  
  
  
  Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political
  donors such as Clive Palmer
  
  
  
  
  
  Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal funder Simon Holmes à Court
  
  
  
  
  
  The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to their irregular calls
  to tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt and Senator
  Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)
  
  The major parties have long complained about the influence the likes of Simon Holmes
  à Court wields behind the scenes amongst the Teals. 
  
  And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the past, contrary to their irregular calls to tighten donations rules.
  
  
  Now that tangible change has been proposed, these bastions of virtue are running a mile from reforms that will
  curtail dark art of political donations.
  
  The Labor government isn't even seeking for these
  transparency rules to take effect immediately, by the way.
  It won't be some sort of quick-paced power play before the next election designed
  to catch the crossbench out.
  
  They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving everyone enough time to absorb and understand the changes
  before preparing for them.
  
  Don't get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor
  and the Coalition. I imagine the opposition want to go over the
  laws with a fine tooth comb.
  
  As they should - because it certainly isn't beyond Labor to include hidden one-party advantages in the proposed design which would create loopholes only the unions are capable
  of taking advantage of, therefore disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years
  to come.
  
  But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a deal to get these proposed laws implemented, the crossbench should offer their support, not cynical opposition, to what is being advocated for.
  
  
  They might even be able to offer something worthwhile
  that could be incorporated in the package.
  
  To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false commentary
  about being in politics to 'clean things up'.
• Comment Link sobota, 30 november 2024 23:12 posted by จัดดอกไม้หน้าเมรุ ราคาถูก

  id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading">Search results
  
  Help
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  English
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Tools
  
  
  
  Tools
  move to sidebar hide
  
  Actions
  
  
  
  
  
  General
• Comment Link sobota, 30 november 2024 21:14 posted by real estate agent in Pittsboro NC

  I am really loving the theme/design of your web site. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility problems?
  A few of my blog visitors have complained about my
  site not operating correctly in Explorer but looks great in Opera.
  
  Do you have any suggestions to help fix this issue?
• Comment Link sobota, 30 november 2024 21:08 posted by รับจัดงานศพ

  id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading">Search results
  
  Help
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  English
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Tools
  
  
  
  Tools
  move to sidebar hide
  
  Actions
  
  
  
  
  
  General
• Comment Link sobota, 30 november 2024 21:03 posted by This Site

  Amazing issues here. I am very glad to peer your post. Thanks so much and I'm taking a look
  ahead to touch you. Will you kindly drop me a mail?
• Comment Link sobota, 30 november 2024 20:54 posted by ดอกไม้ไหว้ศพ

  Joker: Folie À Deux — starring Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix — may have
  bombed at the box office, but the name behind the new flick is a perfect fit that nails its darkly playful tone. 
  
  Folie À Deux directly translates to madness for two. 
  
  The term means 'the presence of the same or similar delusional ideas
  in two persons closely associated with one another', According to Merriam-Webster. 
  
  And while the name is a stroke of clever ingenuity,
  the film itself might leave audiences feeling more bewildered than entertained. 
  
  The new flick has garnered the lowest CinemaScore in comic book
  movie history as it bombed at the box office on opening
  night. 
  
  
  
  
  Joker: Folie À Deux — starring Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix —
  may have bombed at the box office, but the name behind the new
  flick is a perfect fit that nails its darkly playful tone
  
  
  
  
  
  Folie À Deux directly translates to madness for two. The term
  means 'the presence of the same or similar delusional ideas in two persons closely associated with one another'
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  The psychological musical thriller — which has been criticized as 'bleak'
  and 'disappointing' — officially released in theaters on Friday, October 4, but it only raked
  in $20 million at the domestic box office, per The Hollywood Reporter. 
  
  
  
  Read More
  
  Joker: Folie À Deux is branded 'bleak' and the 'most disappointing follow-up' by critics
  
  
  Joaquin reprised his role as the Joker in the sequel,
  which had earned him an Oscar for his portrayal in the 2019 film, while
  Gaga took on the role of Harleen Lee Quinzel (Harley Quinn). 
  
  However, Joker: Folie À Deux has been given a D rating on CinemaScore — the
  lowest score for a comic book movie at the time of writing. 
  
  Madame Web — which notably also flopped in theaters earlier this year and also received terrible
  reviews — holds a higher score with a C+. 
  
  On Rotten Tomatoes, the movie currently holds an audience score of 31 percent and a
  critic score of 33 percent. 
  
  The sequel is projected to rake in less that $50 million at the domestic box
  office during the entirety of opening weekend, per The Hollywood Reporter. 
  
  The movie had been projected to bring in around $70 million - but the number has since drastically dropped. 
  
  Joker (2019) notably opened with $96.2 million when the film first released
  in theaters - and eventually landed a little over $1 billion in the global box office. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  It has garnered the lowest CinemaScore in comic book movie history as the film bombs at the box office
  on opening night
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  It received a D rating on CinemaScore - the lowest score for a comic book movie
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  On Rotten Tomatoes, the movie currently holds an audience score of 31% and a critic score of 32%
  
  The first movie - which was also directed by Todd Phillips - had a budget of between $55 and $70 million. However, the budget increased for Folie À Deux to around $200 million. 
  
  The 2019 movie garnered praise and positive reviews from both critics and audiences - and won the Golden Lion during the
  76th Venice International Film Festival. 
  
  Joaquin received an Oscar for Best Actor for his portrayal of the
  Joker (Arthur Fleck) - and the film garnered an additional Academy Award for Best Original Score. 
  
  The sequel also screened during the Venice International Film Festival last month in September,
  where it earned a 12-minute standing ovation, per Deadline.   
  
  However, audiences have since taken to X after the movie released in theaters on Friday - and shared their opinions
  on the sequel, which features musical sequences. 
  
  One fan penned, 'Joaquin Phoenix don't deserve this. what happened to the script?' while another added, 'is it that bad,' followed by a crying face emoji. 
  
  'Ironically I feel that a musical, if done well, could have been a good choice.
  It'd show how much of an unreliable narrator Fleck is,' one typed. 
  
  'But with some original songs, that keep everything vague, not
  just covers. Also when I heard of the ending I snorted fr.' 
  
  A social media user wrote, 'Stop making sequels as musicals if the original
  wasn't a musical.' 
  
  'Maybe he [Phillips] only had an hour long movie, and decided to randomly
  add musical scenes to fill the runtime,' one penned. 
  
  'Joker downfall really needs to be studied,' another shared,
  along with a monkey staring out a window. 
  
  One fan said, 'the movie sucks. i had to walk out of the
  cinema,' while another penned, 'After years of disagreement....*Joker 2 releases* Critics [shaking hands] Audience.' 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  However, audiences have since taken to X after the movie
  released in theaters on Friday - and shared their opinions over the
  sequel, which was also a musical
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  'Ironically I feel that a musical, if done well, could have been a good
  choice. It'd show how much of an unreliable narrator Fleck is,' one typed
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  'Joker downfall really needs to be studied,' another shared, along with a
  monkey staring out a window
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  'That's way below what we expected,' one wrote in regards to the current Rotten Tomatoes scores.
  'People are saying this is the worst sequel ever.' 
  
  A fan explained, 'yea this film was bad.
  it was pretentious and dull. has the aesthetic of an arthouse film without the substance.' 
  
  'It also insults the audience's intelligence. the songs were also underwhelming too.
  they shouldn't have let this escape to theaters.' 
  
  One shared, 'The audience that loved the first movie is not
  the same audience running to see musicals. This was a gigantic mistake from step 1.' 
  
  During an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Phillips discussed whether he would be interested
  in making a third Joker film or a movie centered around Gaga's character. 
  
  'It's not really where this movie is headed for me.
  I feel like my time in the DC Universe was these
  two films.' 
  
  
  Joaquin PhoenixLady Gaga